Category Archives: girls

Why you should read the drug package inserts

If for some reason you need to take pharmaceutical drugs, protect yourself and loved ones by reading the package inserts. According to this research adverse drug events happen to the the tune of $3.5 billion dollars, and those are the reported incidents.

The new Food and Drug Administration drug package insert: implications for patient safety and clinical care.

Watson KT, Barash PG.
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8051, USA.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the scientific, regulatory, and public health agency that regulates many products, including food products, drugs, medical devices, radiation emitting devices, and cosmetics for the federal government of the United States. The FDA’s mission is to assure that consumer products made and sold in the United States are safe, effective, and pure. The purpose of the package insert (also known as prescription drug product insert or professional labeling) is to provide detailed drug information compiled and distributed by the drug manufacturer, after FDA review and approval.

In 2006, the standard format for the package insert was changed in an attempt to make it more user-friendly and a more efficient resource tool for practitioners.

According to the Institute of Medicine, in-hospital adverse drug reactions occur at a rate of 400,000 per year and incur $3.5 billion of extra hospital expense. It is expected that the new package insert format will enhance rapid access to important pharmacologic information and improve patient safety by decreasing medication errors.

Research: Chlamydia and Ovarian Cancer

Chlamydia is a common sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by the bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis, which can damage a woman’s reproductive organs. Even though symptoms of chlamydia are usually mild or absent, serious complications that cause irreversible damage, including infertility, can occur “silently” before a woman ever recognizes a problem. Chlamydia also can cause discharge from the penis of an infected man. (more info at the CDC)

The research abstract below shows a probable link between chlamydia and ovarian cancer.

Research Summary
Ovarian cancer is a highly lethal disease and its underlying biology is poorly understood. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in BRCA + women have recently implicated the fimbria as a site of origin for high-grade serous carcinoma and its intraepithelial precursors. This suggests that at least some ovarian cancers, probably the most aggressive ones, may not originate in the ovary itself, but rather may arise in the uterine tubes.

Chronic inflammation is associated with carcinogenesis in several tissues, including liver, esophagogastric junction (cardia), and the uterine cervix. The mechanisms underlying the relationship between inflammation and cancer are complex and involve common pathways, in addition to DNA damage.

A critical source of uterine tube inflammation is infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. We hypothesize that C. trachomatis infection may be involved in chronic tubal inflammation and subsequent fimbrial carcinogenesis. Fimbrial intraepithelial precursors can evolve into high grade serous carcinomas that spread rapidly to the ovarian surface and peritoneum; such tumors may appear to be primary ovarian neoplasia, though in reality being a secondary malignancy. This hypothesis must be further investigated to understand the intracellular signaling pathways involved in Chlamydia infection and its healing, and their relationship to carcinogenesis in order to discover potential therapeutic molecular targets.

If our hypothesis were confirmed, salpingectomy instead of ovariectomy may also become the recommended surgery for high risk women.

for the abstract source —>
Is Chlamydia-infected tubal fimbria the origin of ovarian cancer?

Sexual Activity and Reducing STD Risk

Health Risks of Noncoital Sexual Activity

Washington, DC — When counseling patients about preventing sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), it’s important for physicians to ask direct questions about both intercourse and noncoital sexual activity, according to a new Committee Opinion issued today by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

Noncoital sexual behavior includes mutual masturbation, and oral and anal sex and is common among adults and adolescents. Despite concerns expressed in the popular media about an increase in oral sex among adolescents and young adults, there is no evidence that this is the case. However, research does show that oral sex is much more common among adolescents who have already had vaginal intercourse, suggesting that these sexual activities occur at about the same time and with the same partner.

“Most people, including adolescents, are unlikely to use condoms during oral sex, which places them at risk for acquiring an STD,
” said Richard Guido, MD, chair of ACOG’s Committee on Adolescent Health Care, which issued the opinion along with ACOG’s Committee on Gynecologic Practice. “This unlikelihood is partly because of a greater perceived safety compared with intercourse. Although sexual behavior is a sensitive issue to address for both patients and physicians, it’s important to discuss sexuality frankly and without judgment so that we can help our patients fully protect themselves against STDs.”

Risk of getting certain STDs varies depending on the specific disease and the sexual behavior:

  • the risk of acquiring HIV through oral sex is less than through vaginal sex
  • with receptive anal sex having the highest risk
  • Herpes is commonly transmitted through kissing and through oral, vaginal, and anal sex.
  • Herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1), typically associated with oral herpes (ie, “cold sores”), can be transmitted to the genitals through oral sex.
  • Herpes simplex virus Type 2 (HSV-2), typically associated with genital herpes, can be transmitted to the mouth through oral sex.
  • Nonviral STDs, including gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis, also can be transmitted through noncoital sexual activity.

“Our lesbian and bisexual patients also need be screened for STDs based on the same risk factors as other women,” Dr. Guido noted. “Most lesbians have been sexually active with men at some point. Even without this sexual history, there are some STDs that can be transmitted between two women during sexual activity.”

According to ACOG, physicians should ask more direct questions about a patient’s sexual behavior so that they can provide counseling on ways to lower the risk for STDs. Since most women who engage in noncoital sexual activity are also having intercourse, clinicians need to consider whether these noncoital behaviors add any additional risks to those already posed by intercourse.

Risk-reduction strategies:

  • limiting the number of sexual partners,
  • STD testing before engaging in sexual activity with a new partner
  • correct and consistent use of condoms
  • abstinence
  • and/or mutual monogamy.

Committee Opinion #417, “Addressing Health Risks of Noncoital Sexual Activity,” is published in the September 2008 issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

# # #

The Gardasil Vaccine

“. . . If the State can tag, track down and force citizens against their will to be injected with biologicals of unknown toxicity today, there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the State can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.”

The above is a quote from a vaccine blog I just discovered. It is well written and informative. Visit it here.

GARDASIL Vaccine: The Damage Continues
by Barbara Loe Fisher

http://vaccineawakening.blogspot.com/2008/08/gardasil-vaccine-damage-continues.html

www.vaccineawakening.blogspot.com
www.NVIC.org
www.StandUpBeCounted.org

The vaccine reaction reports keep coming into the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) from mothers describing how they took their healthy teenage girls into a pediatrician or gynecologist’s office where they were given a GARDASIL shot and, then, nothing was ever the same again. The reports of HPV vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths continue to roll in, not only to NVIC but also to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (Search HPV4 at http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.html) newspapers, and television stations. And the only response that comes from officials at the CDC, FDA and drug companies when perfectly healthy teenage girls collapse into unconsciousness, suffer a massive seizure, get paralyzed or die suddenly after being injected with GARDASIL is the zombie mantra: “It is a coincidence.”

Last week a nurse who is an administrator in the outpatient department for a group of hospitals in California called and asked if NVIC had been getting reports of unusual collapse after GARDASIL vaccination. I said, yes, we are getting those reports and she said “A lot of our patients are collapsing after the shot is given. It happens with GARDASIL more frequently than with any other vaccine we give.” That same week, NVIC received a report from the mother of a 15 year old daughter who got her first GARDASIIL shot last month. Within 10 minutes of being injected, she collapsed and had her first grand mal seizure, became incontinent, temporarily lost vision in her right eye, suffered uncontrolled vomiting and had to be taken by ambulance to the hospital. Another report to NVIC that week also involved first-time seizures in a 15 year old girl after she got a GARDASIL shot.

Through June 30, 2008, there have been reports that at least 17 to 20 deaths have occurred following GARDASIL and were filed with the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), although the FDA has yet to admit even one death is causally related to the vaccine, suggesting that the girls would have died that day even if no vaccine had been given. Many of the teenage girls ,who die suddenly after vaccination without explanation, were among the brightest and the best and in top physician condition. This was true for 17 year old Jessica Ericzon, a New York softball player, snowboarder and honor roll student who dropped dead within 48 hours of getting a GARDASIL shot. A coroner could find no cause for her death after an autopsy.

There have been so many reports of reactions, injuries and deaths following GARDASIL vaccination (20-25 percent of all vaccine adverse event reports being filed with VAERS are for GARDASIL vaccine reactions) that the FDA and CDC issued a statement defending the vaccine’s safety on July 22.

But one of the vaccine’s developers has urged caution and offers practical advice about the need for continued use of Pap screening to prevent cervical cancer rather than relying on the vaccine to do the job. ” If you are at all concerned, then don’t have the vaccine – have regular Pap smears and you will be equally protected from cervical cancer….Pap screening is still the only proven method we have for cervical cancer prevention,” said Professor Diane Harper, Ph.D. “We don’t know how long the vaccine will protect a woman from HPV infection, and the vaccine does not protect against all types of HPV infection that cause cervical cancer.”

The “coincidence” defense mounted by doctors and drug company officials every time a vaccination is followed by injury and death is as old as it is unscientific. It is amazing that they have been able to get away with it for so long. Babies can’t talk and babies can’t walk so who they will become is still a dream. But young girls and women have already become much of who they will be and, on the cusp of fulfilling the dream, their vaccine deaths and injuries are much more difficult to sweep under the carpet.

It is immoral for doctors in government and industry to continue to look away from the damage done when vaccines cut down the brightest and most physically fit among us. The suggestion that these healthy, high functioning girls were biologically compromised and would have died or been injured that day even if no vaccine had been given is ludicrous. If those in government responsible for protecting the public health and safety look the other way when healthy individuals die and are injured by pharmaceutical products pronounced by government as “safe” for public use, then we cannot be assured that any licensed drug or vaccine is safe.

Last year, the head of the FDA in China was executed for allowing toxic pharmaceutical products to be licensed and released for public use that ended up killing and crippling people.

Medical Errors Cost Billions

Avoidable medical errors, such as bed sores, surgical instruments left in the body after surgery and urinary tract infections linked to catheter use will not be eligible for reimbursement. Starting Oct. 1, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will stop reimbursing hospitals for the treatment of eight major preventable errors…more.

HPV vaccine mandates

Viruses are not the cause per se of cervical cancer. There has to be exposure to the virus and their has to a susceptibility to it. Their are many factors involved and by changing those inputs (behavior, diet,nutrition, life focus, spiritual focus of an individual, teaching wise choices vs. risky behaviors, etc.) outcomes can be changed. There are healthier approaches beyond vaccination.

A Research Study

HPV vaccine mandates: just say ‘no’ to the “great big public health experiment”

While many states are seriously considering requiring vaccination of pre-teen girls as a condition of middle school admission, the case for mandatory human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is very weak. Such a requirement lacks the traditional justification for vaccine mandates and therefore represents an unjustified usurpation of parental authority. Moreover, serious questions remain as to whether the vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer. The vaccine is the most expensive pediatric vaccine in history. Given the uncertainties surrounding the vaccine, Missouri lawmakers and taxpayers should reject this expensive and intrusive “public health experiment”.

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA. Bob.Onder@house.mo.gov

American Teenage Girls, One in Four May Have an Sexually Transmitted Disease

“What we found is alarming,” Dr. Sara Forhan, from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said during a teleconference Tuesday. “One in four female adolescents in the U.S. has at least one of the four most common STDs that affects women.”"These numbers translate into 3.2 million young women nationwide who are infected with an STD,” Forhan said. “This means that far too many young women are at risk of the serious health effects of untreated STDs, including infertility and cervical cancer.”

These common STDs include human papillomavirus (HPV), chlamydia, herpes simplex virus and trichomoniasis, Forhan said.

Forhan announced the results as part of the CDC’s 2008 National STD Prevention Conference, in Chicago.

“These findings are really giving us a lot of pause about how we provide care to adolescent girls who are sexually active,” said Dr. Elizabeth Alderman, an adolescent medicine specialist at Children’s Hospital at Montefiore in New York City and chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Section of Adolescent Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “The numbers are really astonishing.”

Forhan noted that most of the burden of STDs falls on young African-American women. “Among African-American teenagers, about one in two were affected compared to one in five white teens,” she said.

In terms of the racial disparity, “it’s what we’ve always seen, which is very unfortunate,” Alderman said.

In the study, Forhan’s team collected data on 838 girls aged 14 to 19 who took part in the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study did not include syphilis, gonorrhea or HIV, as earlier studies found very low prevalence of these diseases in this age group.

HPV and chlamydia are the most common STDs found among teenage girls, Forhan said. “Almost one in five overall had a strain of HPV associated with cervical cancer or genital warts,” she said.

“We need to be screening adolescent girls who are sexually active and providing them with HPV vaccine,” Alderman said. “The recommendations are to screen sexually active girls, but many girls don’t disclose to their health-care provider that they are sexually active, even when asked,” she said.

As for chlamydia, 4 percent of teenaged girls had this STD, Forhan said. “The majority of chlamydia infections do not have symptoms. If left untreated, it can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, which leaves these young women at risk for atopic pregnancy, chronic pelvic pain or infertility,” she said.

In addition, the study found that 2.9 percent of young women had trichomoniasis, and 2 percent were infected with genital herpes, Forhan said.

According to Forhan, about 50 percent of the teens reported having sex, and the prevalence of STDs in this group was 40 percent. “Even for young women with only one reported lifetime sexual partner, one in five had an STD,” she noted.

“If you choose to be sexually active, you need to protect yourself and be screened for these infections,” Alderman said. “And all girls between the ages of 11 and 26 should get vaccinated for HPV.”

Among women with an STD, 15 percent had more than one infection, Forhan added.

“These data provide a clearest picture to date of the overall burden of STDs in adolescent women in the United States,” Forhan said. “The study also underscores the importance of addressing racial disparities in STD rates among young women.”

Race itself is not a risk factor for STDs, Forhan said. However, factors such as limited access to health care, poverty, community prevalence of STDs, and misperceptions about individual risk are some of the reasons that STD rates are particularly high among African-Americans, she said.

Comments:

The female population in the United States ages 0-19 is estimated to be 40,328,895. This sample consisted of slightly over 800 girls. Who were they? What is their way of life? Based on this sample, it is recommended to vaccinate all girls. There are less risky ways to foster the health (if that is the goal) of young girls.