Research: High Fructose, Hormones and your appetite

The High Fructose Corn Syrup Debacle
In recent years the literature grows on the dangers of high fructose corn syrup as a food additive. The corn industry and the sugar industry laud the substance but our bodies tell us different. Growing girths, increased rates of juvenile and adult onset diabetes tell a different tale.

Leptin
The fatty tissue in our body serve necessary functions. One of which is to secrete hormones that regulate our appetite and metabolism. Leptin is an important adipose derived hormone. Leptin is critical in controlling the appetite. Leptin resistance is a factor in obesity. According to a published study by the University of Florida a link between overconsumption of high fructose corn syrup exerts a dampening effect on the bodies ability to respond to the important communication this substance provides within the body.

UF researchers found that rats became resistant to leptin after being fed a diet high in fructose for six months. Although there were no visible signs this change was occurring, the fructose-fed rats gained considerably more weight than rats that never ate fructose when both groups were switched to a high-fat diet.

Typically, leptin resistance develops with obesity, but this study showed that high dietary fructose causes a “silent” leptin resistance, Shapiro said. It develops undetected, but when the high-fat diet is introduced it causes greater than expected obesity.

Tips for Healthy Eating
1. If buying packaged food, read the labels and avoid products that contain high fructose corn syrup.
2. Avoid eating in between meals.
3. Eating whole foods provide a steady release of energy so that cravings are reduced.
4. Eat only when hungry.
5. Avoid eating after 6pm – 7pm.
6. Shop around for exercise dvd’s you enjoy so you can make exercise a regular habit.

full article here

Preventing Colon Cancer, a look at B-6

Many of us are not getting nearly enough B6 from our diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (May, 2008) published a study of nearly 8,000 people showing that B6 inadequacy is common throughout the United States. “Across the study population,” the authors said, “we noticed participants with inadequate vitamin B6 status even though they reported consuming more than the Recommended Daily Allowance of vitamin B6, which is less than 2 milligrams per day.” Three out of four women using oral contraceptives are vitamin B6 deficient, unless they also take vitamin B6 supplements. Smokers and the elderly are also especially likely to be at risk. Remarkably, even among people who take B6 supplements, one in ten is still B6 deficient. (4)

This indicates that we might better take more B6. But many won’t. This is because the public has been warned off of supplementing with this vitamin. So irrational is this fear that, at one point, a so-called “Safe Upper Limit” for daily B6 intake was set at only 10 mg. (6) That was only about six times the US RDA/DRI. Who set such a “limit”? Not the voters, that’s for sure. An unelected committee did it, one created by the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine’s Food and Nutrition Board. (5) They have, in a manner of speaking, recently admitted that they were wrong. The “Safe Upper Limit” is now 100 mg.

That is more like it, but still too low. Alan Gaby, M.D., in reviewing B6 toxicity, wrote that adverse effects from B6 (pyridoxine) were occurring in people taking “2,000 mg/day or more of pyridoxine, although some were taking only 500 mg/day. There is a single case report of a neuropathy occurring in a person taking 200 mg/day of pyridoxine, but the reliability of that case report is unclear. The individual in question was never examined, but was merely interviewed by telephone after responding to a local television report that publicized pyridoxine-induced neuropathy.” Dr Gaby adds that there have been no reports of B6 side effects at under 200 mg/day. (6)

Modern processed, low-nutrient diets are not providing anything close to 200 milligrams. In fact, they typically provide less that 1% of that amount. You can get some B-6 from food, if you really like to eat whole grains, seeds and organ meats. A goodly slice of beef liver contains a whopping 1.2 mg of B-6. Chicken liver is only 0.6 mg per serving, and most other foods contain less. Avocados (0.5 mg each) and bananas (0.7 mg each) lead the pyridoxine league for fruits. Potatoes (0.7 mg each) and nuts (especially filberts, peanuts and walnuts) are fairly good vegetable sources.

But people are not eating nuts, seeds, vegetables, and liver. What they are eating is way too many nutrient-poor junk foods. Our diets are low in B6, yet B6 reduces risk of colon cancer. Clearly supplementation is the way to go.

Orthomolecular Medicine News

Orthomolecular.org

Times are tough, the choice between food and medication

A poll by Macmillan Cancer Support suggests nearly half of cancer patients in England are being forced to cut back on basic necessities in order to pay for their prescriptions.

(rest of the story)

Benefits of Homeopathy

One of the benefits of homeopathy is that the remedies work to arouse your vital force to help your body to heal itself. The care itself is less expensive comparatively, so are the medicines, known as “remedies.” The amount of time the remedy is taken is generally much shorter than allopathic medications, with homeopathy less is more. As the body resets itself and healing is taking place the remedy is not taken.

The homeopathic model doesn’t induce additional financial pressures on someone when their energy is best used to heal.

Biological Drugs Problems with drug safety

Almost one-quarter of biologic therapies approved in the United States and Europe since 1995 have been the subject of at least one safety-related regulatory action in the decade since they were approved.

Eleven percent, including Remicade (infliximab), used to treat Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, and Avastin (bevacizumab), used to treat cancer, have been issued a “black box” warning.

The findings, from Dutch scientists, are published in the Oct. 22/29 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“This suggests the need for more in-depth investigation before approval and highlights the importance of vigilance in post-marketing surveillance for adverse effects,” Dr. Phil B. Fontanarosa, the journal’s executive deputy editor, said during a a Tuesday teleconference on the themed issue.

“[Adverse effects] generally occurred in general disorders, like serious allergic reaction or cardiac arrest, administration site problems, infections and infestations,” said Fontanarosa. “A lot of these drugs act on the immune system, so infections are common complications of these products.”

“We’ve always known that because biologics were going to modulate the immune system, there would be this risk,” said Lisa Saubermann, associate director of clinical pharmacy services at the University of Rochester Medical Center.

The first biologic treatment, recombinant insulin, was approved in the United States in 1982. Since then, more than 250 biologics have flooded the pharmaceutical market, representing roughly one-quarter of all new drugs approved by U.S. and European Union authorities.

Although all drugs carry risks, biologics are in a special class, because they are derived from biological sources, including antibodies, enzymes and hormones.

Enbrel (etanercept), for instance, is a tumor necrosis factor, a protein made by the body’s immune system. The drug, used to treat various forms of arthritis as well as psoriasis, was also the recipient of a black box warning (for infections and central nervous system disorders).

The authors of this paper, from Utrecht University, reviewed 174 biologics approved in the United States and/or the European Union between January 1995 and June 2007.

Between January 1995 and June 2008, 82 safety-related regulatory actions were issued for 41 of the medications, or almost 24 percent of the total.

Of these 82 actions, 63 were advisory letters to health-care professionals in the United States and Europe, and 19 were black box warnings. None of the drugs were withdrawn from the market.

Homeopathy in Ireland

SMART IRISH party-goers are familiar with the powers of Nux Vomica as a hangover cure. Arnica has also become a household word in many homes across the country and each year a growing number of people grasp the concept of homeopathy as a system of medicine.

While the general public has moved away from confusing Homeopathy with massage and essential oils, it will still take some time and effort to have it accepted as a common form of treatment and integrated into the healthcare system. Nonetheless homeopathy is becoming more and more popular. (more)

Research: Taking a look at a surgical fibroid treatment

Surgery is always major.  Uterine artery embolization has risks.  The following articles discuss the procedures and highlights a research study.  Consider approaches that promote healing the underlying stress and tension, correcting dietary factors, hormonal imbalances and other areas that led to the growth of the condition.  Healing the problem using a holistic approach may be worth considering examine therapies such as homeopathy, acupuncture and/or herbal medicine with a qualified practitioner.

What are the Risks?

Uterine artery embolization

Major complications

Major complications occur in about 1 percent to 5 percent of women undergoing uterine artery embolization. A degenerating fibroid can provide a site for bacterial growth and lead to endometritis. In extreme cases, infection may require a hysterectomy. Unintended embolization of another organ or tissue could lead to serious illness.
Recovery

Most women return home the day after the procedure with a prescription for oral pain medication. Pain usually ends within a day or two, but in some women it may last up to a few weeks.

Monitor your recovery for potential complications:

Vaginal discharge
You might have a mucus-like vaginal discharge after uterine artery embolization that clears without treatment. In a few women, remnants of fibroids are passed through the vagina. This is more likely if the fibroids are submucosal, but it can also occur with intramural fibroids. The discharge isn’t dangerous and usually stops on its own. Rarely, women need hysterectomies after uterine artery embolization treatment to make sure that no remnants remain. You can expect to resume your normal routine in about two weeks.

Infection
Return to your obstetrician-gynecologist or primary care doctor for a follow-up examination within four weeks of the procedure to make sure there’s no infection. Signs and symptoms of infection include fever, chills and pain.

You’ll likely undergo a series of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations over the next year to monitor shrinkage or other changes in the fibroids or your uterus. Doctors usually schedule the first ultrasound examination at three months to allow time for fibroids to shrink. Late infections and vaginal discharge have occasionally been reported up to a year after the procedure.

Menstruation and menopause
Your menstrual period will probably resume within a few months. A small number of women, however, enter menopause after the procedure. The risk appears highest among women age 45 and older. Some embolic agents may pass from branches of the uterine artery to branches of the ovarian artery at areas where the two arterial systems connect. The emboli presumably travel through branches of the ovarian artery to your ovaries. Women who are near menopause (perimenopause) are especially vulnerable to a drop in blood flow. Occasionally disruption of blood supply to the ovaries can lead to menopause. If so, you might be at increased risk of entering menopause after uterine artery embolization.

For women who desire future fertility, uterine artery embolization needs to be carefully considered. Although the risk of entering menopause following the procedure is low, subtle ovarian damage may make getting pregnant more difficult. There also may be an increased risk of pregnancy complications, especially involving abnormal placement of the placenta. Still, despite these concerns, many women have had successful pregnancies following uterine artery embolization.
Common concerns about uterine artery embolization

Radiation exposure
Uterine artery embolization exposes your ovaries to radiation for imaging, about the same amount as two barium enemas performed to examine your colon. Proper technique is critical to minimize radiation.

Infections and scar tissue
Some doctors who perform uterine artery embolization say that it isn’t the best treatment for large submucosal and subserosal fibroids or for fibroids that hang from a stalk (pedunculated). Others report satisfactory results with uterine artery embolization for women with these types of fibroids. Those who are concerned say that a pedunculated fibroid hanging from the uterine cavity could detach from your uterus after treatment, be too large to exit through your vagina and cause infection. Uterine artery embolization for subserosal fibroids may result in the formation of adhesions, bands of scar tissue between pelvic organs. But surgical treatment of fibroids, such as myomectomy, also carries this risk.
Reason to avoid this procedure

Don’t undergo uterine artery embolization if you have:

* A history of pelvic radiation
* A history of kidney failure
* When cancer is a possibility
* An active, recent or chronic pelvic infection
* Poorly controlled diabetes
* Inflammation of the blood vessels (vasculitis)
* A bleeding disorder
* A severe allergy to contrast material containing iodine (the Mayo Clinic offers a well rounded article, here.

Radiology Research

OAK BROOK, Ill. – A new multicenter trial found that uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a good alternative to hysterectomy in women with symptomatic fibroids. The findings of the Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) Trial appear in the March issue of the journal Radiology.

“After two years, patients who had undergone UAE reported health-related quality of life equal to that of women who had undergone hysterectomy,” said study co-author Jim A. Reekers, M.D., Ph.D., an interventional radiologist at Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Uterine fibroids are benign growths of the muscle inside the uterus. According to the National Institutes of Health, at least 25 percent of women in the U.S. age 25 to 50 suffer from symptomatic uterine fibroids. Fibroid symptoms can include excessive menstrual bleeding, enlarged uterine size, frequent urination, pelvic pressure or pain and infertility.

According to the National Women’s Health Information Center, fibroids are the primary reason for surgical removal of the uterus, accounting for approximately one-third of the 600,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the U.S.

UAE is a minimally invasive fibroid treatment in which catheters are placed in each of the two uterine arteries, and small particles are injected to block the arterial branches that supply blood to the fibroids. The fibroid tissue dies, the masses shrink and, in most cases, symptoms are relieved. UAE requires only a local anesthetic and has a shorter recovery period than hysterectomy.

“UAE has a number of benefits compared to hysterectomy,” said co-author Wouter J.K. Hehenkamp, M.D., gynecology resident at Academic Medical Centre. “With UAE, there is a faster recovery time, a shorter hospital stay and, most importantly, the uterus is not removed.”

For the EMMY trial, 177 women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding scheduled to undergo hysterectomy were randomly assigned to undergo UAE (88 women) or hysterectomy (89 women). During a 24-month follow-up period, 20 percent of women who had undergone embolization in the trial subsequently underwent hysterectomy due to insufficient symptomatic relief. Over the same period, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured six times for all women in the trial with a series of scientifically validated questionnaires, which assessed various physical, mental and functional components contributing to quality of life, as well as overall satisfaction with the treatment.

Results showed that HRQOL improved significantly in all patients six months after treatment, except in the defecation distress inventory, which improved significantly in the UAE patients at six-month follow-up, but not the hysterectomy patients. Six weeks after treatment, the UAE patients also scored significantly higher scores on the physical component summary, which measured factors related to physical function.

After 24 months, no HRQOL differences were observed between the two groups, but while more than 90 percent of patients in both groups were at least moderately satisfied with the treatment they received, the hysterectomy patients reported a higher level of overall satisfaction. This may be attributable to the fact that they no longer experienced menstrual cycles or worried that their symptoms would recur. However, previous studies lasting several years have shown that it is rare for treated fibroids to regrow or for new fibroids to develop after UAE.

“For those women seeking absolute certainty of being asymptomatic after treatment, I would recommend a hysterectomy,” Dr. Reekers said. “But for women who wish to retain their uterus and who desire a fast recovery, I would definitely recommend UAE.”

###

Radiology is a monthly scientific journal devoted to clinical radiology and allied sciences. The journal is edited by Herbert Y. Kressel, M.D., Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Radiology is owned and published by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. (RSNA.org/radiologyjnl)

The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) is an association of more than 41,000 radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists and related scientists committed to excellence in patient care through education and research. The Society is based in Oak Brook, Ill. (RSNA.org)

“Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: Treatment with Uterine Artery Embolization or Hysterectomy—Results from the Randomized Clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) Trial.” Collaborating with Drs. Hehenkamp and Reekers were Nicole A. Volkers, M.D., Erwin Birnie, Ph.D., and Willem M. Ankum, M.D., Ph.D.

Are Your Organic Beauty Products, really organic?

Everyone one knows it, organic beauty products cost more. And there are numerous reasons why they appeal to a certain group of consumers. But what if, that $20.00 organic ginger scrub is a fake? One thing is for sure, you want that organic product label to read true, read on…

http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/index.cfm

As reported previously in Organic Bytes, the Organic Consumers Association and Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps have sued organic certifier Ecocert in the ongoing campaign to stop the certification and misleading labeling of fake organic personal care products that are fundamentally made-up of synthetic ingredients and petrochemicals. Dr. Bronner’s has launched a further umbrella lawsuit against specific companies who label their products as “organic” but have primary ingredients that are synthetic. After hearing oral arguments earlier this month, the San Francisco County Superior Court ruled on October 8 that Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps can proceed with its lawsuit seeking to compel so-called “organic” companies and certifiers to drop, or stop certifying, deceptive organic label and brand claims. Brands denounced by OCA and Bronner’s include:

Avalon “Organics”
Jason “Pure, Natural & Organic”
Nature’s Gate “Organics”
Kiss My Face “Obsessively Organic”
Giovanni “Organic Cosmetics”
Head “Organics”
Desert Essence “Organics”
Stella McCartney’s CARE “100% Organic”.

Easy Mexican Coffee Recipe


(no alcohol)

Serves 2

3 tablespoons coarsely ground Viennese roast or any dark-roast coffee
2 tablespoons dark-brown sugar, or try sucanat
2 cinnamon sticks
2 whole cloves
2 cups water

1. Combine the coffee, sugar and cinnamon sticks (break in half), cloves and water in a small saucepan. Bring to a boil, stir, reduce the heat to medium-low, cover and simmer 10 minutes.

2. Strain into warmed coffee cups and serve hot.

Enjoy!

Research: Chlamydia and Ovarian Cancer

Chlamydia is a common sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by the bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis, which can damage a woman’s reproductive organs. Even though symptoms of chlamydia are usually mild or absent, serious complications that cause irreversible damage, including infertility, can occur “silently” before a woman ever recognizes a problem. Chlamydia also can cause discharge from the penis of an infected man. (more info at the CDC)

The research abstract below shows a probable link between chlamydia and ovarian cancer.

Research Summary
Ovarian cancer is a highly lethal disease and its underlying biology is poorly understood. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in BRCA + women have recently implicated the fimbria as a site of origin for high-grade serous carcinoma and its intraepithelial precursors. This suggests that at least some ovarian cancers, probably the most aggressive ones, may not originate in the ovary itself, but rather may arise in the uterine tubes.

Chronic inflammation is associated with carcinogenesis in several tissues, including liver, esophagogastric junction (cardia), and the uterine cervix. The mechanisms underlying the relationship between inflammation and cancer are complex and involve common pathways, in addition to DNA damage.

A critical source of uterine tube inflammation is infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. We hypothesize that C. trachomatis infection may be involved in chronic tubal inflammation and subsequent fimbrial carcinogenesis. Fimbrial intraepithelial precursors can evolve into high grade serous carcinomas that spread rapidly to the ovarian surface and peritoneum; such tumors may appear to be primary ovarian neoplasia, though in reality being a secondary malignancy. This hypothesis must be further investigated to understand the intracellular signaling pathways involved in Chlamydia infection and its healing, and their relationship to carcinogenesis in order to discover potential therapeutic molecular targets.

If our hypothesis were confirmed, salpingectomy instead of ovariectomy may also become the recommended surgery for high risk women.

for the abstract source —>
Is Chlamydia-infected tubal fimbria the origin of ovarian cancer?

Content Protected Using Blog Protector Plugin By: Make Money.

Optimized by SEO Ultimate